Royal family and Cabinet Office accused of 'cover up' as new Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor files are 'blocked'

The royal family have been accused of ordering the files to be privatised
Ella Clarke

The Cabinet Office is facing accusations of orchestrating a cover-up to shield the royal family, after it abruptly withdrew a batch of government files relating to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s publicly funded travel expenses, just before their release to the National Archives.

The documents were first shared with the media in a press preview. They were expected to reveal new details about Andrew’s work as the UK’s trade envoy.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor at Duchess of Kent's funeral
Files detailing Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s travel expenses were made private (Credit: Cover Images)

Files on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor reportedly pulled by Cabinet Office

Journalists who saw the files before they were reportedly pulled say they appeared “unremarkable”.

However, they are said to have included key details, such as a 2005 Cabinet note showing that a rule change would require the Royal Travel Office to pay for Andrew’s trade trips. This would add £90,000 a year to its budget. The trips included visits to China, Russia, Southeast Asia, and Spain.

But in a sudden reversal, the Cabinet Office withdrew the files, claiming they had been included in error. As reported by The Guardian, a spokesperson cited it as an “administrative error.”

The retraction has raised eyebrows among campaigners. Graham Smith, CEO of the anti-monarchy group Republic, was blunt.

He accused the royal family of a ‘cover-up’ to protect their reputation.

“The most likely reason for this attempt to stop disclosure is pressure from the palace,” he said. “The royals have sought to keep everything under wraps when it comes to Andrew. Not to protect him, but to protect themselves.”

Smith also argued that the routine withholding of royal-related records under the Public Records Act is undemocratic.

Royal Insider contacted Buckingham Palace and the Cabinet Office for comment.

A Cabinet Office spokesperson said: “All records are managed in line with the requirements of the Public Records Act. Any release is subject to an extensive review process, including engaging expert stakeholders.”

The representative also noted that, as a matter of routine and under the terms of the Public Records Act and the Freedom of Information Act, redactions are made to government documents in the National Archives before being released to the public.

They also highlighted that because of this, no list should be considered final until it is released to the public.

King Charles and Queen Camilla at Christmas Day walkabout 2025
The royal family have been accused of ordering the files to be privatised (Credit: Cover Images)

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor scandal

This is the latest in a long list of controversies involving Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.

According to reports, Metropolitan Police firearms officers visited Royal Lodge on November 19 and requested that Andrew surrender his firearms and shotgun certificate. The certificate was handed over voluntarily.

“On Wednesday, November 19, firearms licensing officers attended an address in Windsor to request that a man in his 60s voluntarily surrender his firearms and shotgun certificate,” a Met spokesperson confirmed to The Sun. “The certificate was surrendered. We will not be commenting any further at this stage.”

A royal insider reportedly described the move as “a real blow” to Andrew, who has long been a fixture at royal shooting parties and an avid huntsman.

While the exact reason for the licence surrender remains unclear, the timing is notable. It came just weeks after reports that King Charles had begun formal proceedings to remove Andrew’s royal titles.

Prince Andrew
Andrew has been stripped of all his titles (Credit: CoverImages.com)

The accusations against Andrew

That decision followed renewed scrutiny over Andrew’s links to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

In October, a leaked 2011 email appeared to contradict Andrew’s infamous 2019 Newsnight interview, in which he claimed to have cut ties with Epstein in December 2010. In the newly surfaced email, allegedly sent from Andrew to Epstein, the royal reportedly wrote, “We’ll play some more soon.”

The latest development is just one in a long line of scandals linked to the former duke.

Most notably, Virginia Giuffre accused Andrew of sexually abusing her on three occasions when she was 17 and being trafficked by Epstein.

Andrew has always denied the allegations. He settled a civil case with Giuffre in 2022 without admission of guilt.

He vehemently defends his innocence.

Read more: Public’s ‘verdict’ on seeing Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie at Christmas walkabout as ‘snubbed’ Andrew ‘spotted’

So, what do you think? Let us know by leaving a comment on our Facebook page @RoyalInsider